This spammy piece of email made it through spamassassin and into my inbox this afternoon:
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:46:08 GMT From: xxxxxxxxxx@messaging.sprintpcs.com To: ziggyAt first glance, it looked like another HTML spam with a link to some pr0n. The use of the literal "{firstName}" in the body of the message looked rather odd, as did poorly auto-generated content of the message.Subject: A Picture from my PCS Vision Camera Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_70_80, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_WEB_BUGS,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.54 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.54 (1.174.2.17-2003-05-11-exp) Content-Length: 6487 Lines: 111 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You have received a Picture Share from {firstName}. To view it, click the link below: [...]
Just as I was about to delete it, I looked at the email address again. It was a 10 digit number, and looked vaguely like a phone number of someone who would call me. I checked the link, and it was indeed a picture from someone's phone.
I'm counting the days before pr0nspam and harrassing email starts coming through this way...
I habitually do a reverse lookup of unknown numbers, so I would have tossed that number into Watson to see who it belonged to before I clicked. But if the spammers got lots of phone numbers related to a community website, they could fake the sender with a likely number, and it might end up spam anyway.
Has Friendster or the like had any security breaches lately?
Re:Reverse-lookup the number.
ziggy on 2003-10-24T23:50:38
Yes, but that was not immediately obvious given how the message was constructed.Was it a picture of some(one|thing) you know?