So I switched from departmental sponsored CVS versioning to my own Subversion repository. It's not bad.
I've given it a moderate workout so far. Created repositories with the command-line (for some reason, the otherwise excellent Tortoise SVN was a bit unintuitive), added some source trees. So far, so good. I haven't used any features that make it wonderfully better than CVS, but my requirements from a versioning system are pretty modest anyway, so I don't expect a radical change in how I manage things
Also added my documents directory, and took a leap of faith by checking in the half done thesis proposal into it. No mishaps so far :) Although I use CVS/Subversion on binaries just to keep track of the revision count. AFAIK binaries don't get accurate diff. Now, if I only figure out a good WSIWYG Tex Editor, I can abandon MS-Word/RTF forever :)
Re:Deleting: weird
tinman on 2004-04-10T15:41:13
I didn't mind that, because from how I understood it, deleting is also an action, just like updating. If you don't like that change, you just rollback. It seemed more natural to me(more database like)
Kind of like "send to recycle bin" and "shift-delete" if you like.
I generally have fun trying to organize my repositories. Wondering if I should have a separate one for documents together with one for my source trees. Something like WinCVS would be handy too
:) but that's wishing for a lot Re:Deleting: weird
jplindstrom on 2004-04-12T00:17:57
Given the right mindset, it's logical, yes.
I'm probably damaged by SourceSafe, wherein you can't delete a file twice, unless you destroy the file first, which you can't because you don't have the access rights...
*sigh*
Re:LyX
tinman on 2004-04-12T21:41:22
Neat.. I hadn't actually. I was trying out WinTex.Will give it a shot, thanks.