all hail chocolateboy (and autobox)

rjbs on 2008-05-13T02:08:59

The autobox pragma first showed up a few years ago. It lets you do something like this:

use autobox;

[ qw(wonderful is very autobox) ]
  ->sort->map(sub { ucfirst })->join(q{ })->print;

...to print: Autobox Is Very Wonderful

At first, it was pretty neat, but it required patches to perl. By 2005, it had been rewritten to require no patch, but was still pretty scary and experimental, at least to me. Over the last few years, I've looked over toward autobox a few times, itching to use it all over the place, but never quite willing to do so because of a few significant limitations.

First of all, this didn't work: $array_ref->$method_name

Method names needed to be literals, meaning that it was more difficult to pick a method at runtime with autoboxed values than with standard objects.

More importantly, this didn't work: @array->method

This was important because this wouldn't work either: \@array->method

The precedence of -> is higher than \, so it took a reference to the result of @array->method, which was equivalent (as I recall) to:

(my $x = @array)->method

...so, not very useful.

Over the last few weeks, these two bugs have been addressed. The only thing that I'm still not entirely sold on is that this does not do the right thing:

my @new = grep { ... } @old->sort;

Sure, I could write @old->sort->flatten, but that's not the point. I want the result of sort to be usable as a flat list, the same was @old was. Coding that would require knowing that the invocant of the autoboxing class's method was not a reference to begin with, and that information isn't available.

Still, it's not bad at all. This morning I released a new Moose::Autobox, adding a flatten method to both Array and Hash. I think I see a lot of autoboxing in my future!