You know how bad ideas just seem to come to you. Earlier today I was chatting to Nick about how an earlier incarnation of the p5p summary used to have a "Thanks, Applied"[0] count.
Handily there are other conventions followed by the committers so you can identify these changesets by simply examining the log entry.
You can find my results and the code at http://unixbeard.net/user/richardc/lab/applied_graph/
[0] Jarkko Hietaniemi, the recently retired 5.8 pumpking would acknowlege a patch accepted via the perl5-porters mailing list by writing "Thanks, Applied" in reply.
Re:*cough*
richardc on 2002-08-03T18:22:30
Doh! 8921 apologies.
In my defense I didn't even try and spell it, but instead copied from Simon's p5p FAQ.I there an actual timescale on everyone being able to pronounce it correctly? And will the sun be nice and cool by then?
:) Re:*cough*
nicholas on 2002-08-03T21:55:00
But I can. It's Jarkko. Two Ks, one R.
Google thinks that's enough to find the right person::-) http://www.google.com/search?q=Jarkko
and who am I to argue with google? <ducks>