Dear linguistic lazyweb...

nicholas on 2008-04-18T19:21:19

So there was this social, and we worked out that killing a cat would be felicide, but what we didn't work out was whether there is a precise word for killing a kitten (or at least something that makes it clear that it's a small cat).

Crazy, er curious minds want to know. Mostly so that they can write rules interdicting it.


How about

mauzo on 2008-04-18T20:21:05

microfelicide?

Perhaps

jsmith on 2008-04-18T20:28:51

pedofelicide?

Definitely...

Damian on 2008-04-18T21:58:34

"feliculacide"

Actually...

Ron Savage on 2008-04-19T02:52:40

Dog-lover!

Re:Definitely...

aurum on 2008-04-21T22:27:15

"feliculacide"
That's what I suggested on the evening, but I've just come home and checked my Cassell's, and it suggests "catulus" for kitten; that would render 'catulucide', which I think has better prosody. I'm going to check the huge reference tomes in the Bodleian tomorrow, though, because it surprises me that "catulus" would be real.

Re:Catulus

Damian on 2008-04-22T23:16:57

My understanding is that catulus was quite generic, meaning "any cute baby animal" and was, in fact, predominantly used in referring to puppies. There are several instances where ancient writers, specifically referring to a kitten, feel it necessary to clarify that point by writing catulus felis. Whereas only rarely do they seem to bother with catulus canis, as far as I can discover (and even then, it seems, mainly for poetic reasons).

Indeed, Isidorus Hispalensis in his medieval encyclopaedia, "Etymologiae", states that:

The offspring of any animal whatsoever are wrongly called catuli. Strictly speaking, catuli are the offspring only of dogs.
(Of course, you have to take Saint Isidore with a grain of salt. In the very next paragraph, for example, he goes on to explain that in India they breed dogs and wild tigers together to produce canines so strong and violent that "they overcome even lions in close combat". Still, it seems likely that a 6th century Roman Catholic archbishop knows more about Latin than he does about zoology, genetics, or Vedic animal husbandry.)

So while I agree with you that, on prosody alone, "catulicide" is clearly better than "feliculacide", I feel that in terms of semantic precision, the latter is still clearly superior. To get the equivalent species specificity out of catulus, you'd need something like "catulofelicide". Which, come to think of it, might actually be easier on the tongue than either of the other two.

Of course, this does illustrate that real problem here isn't etymological; it's theological. Namely: every time The Lord God Almighty punishes Nick's depraved thoughts and deeds, does it have to be a kitten (felicula) that He, in His Just and Terrible Wrath, strikes dead? Or would any other baby animal (catulus) do as well?

If He, in His Infinite Mercy, is just as happy to slaughter puppies and ducklings and baby hamsters in expiation of Nick's many iniquities, then "catulicide" is the right word. But if it's only kittens whose innocent blood redeems Nick's endless depravities, then I think we have to go with "feliculacide" or "catulofelicide".

Re:Catulus

aurum on 2008-04-23T05:42:18

Interesting about the Etymologiae. I actually discussed the puppy/generic animal issue to some extent in my one and only journal post to date. The Etymologiae may have been referenced in the Thesaurus, but (O irony) my Latin is sufficiently rusty that I was having trouble reading the full entry.

It is certainly true that "catulus" especially referred to puppies in the classical period (c.f. Lewis & Short), but I would argue that Isidore's pedantry shows us that the meaning of the word *was* shifting. Isidore, like a good proto-classicist and linguistic prescriptivist, would have wanted to nip such lazy language use in the bud; what set him apart from an actual classicist is that he was happy to contradict such authorities as Virgil, Pliny, and Phaedrus to do so. I, like any good medievalist / Byzantinist, am happy to accept the later meaning of "cattus" and, by extension, "catulus".

All that said, I'd say that "catulofelicide" is probably the best of our options. It has that quality of acceptability to both the purist classicist and the laissez-faire medievalist. It definitely has better prosody than "feliculicide", and will better accommodate Nick's iniquitous needs by virtue of sounding more complicated, technical, and just plain satisfying than "catulicide".

Hmmm...

davebaker on 2008-04-19T12:28:25

cantdecide