Still fodder for the conversation

merlyn on 2006-02-20T01:50:17

It's nice to see that my legal case continues to be noticed and discussed by experts.


Interesting Story

GAVollink on 2006-02-28T21:43:07

Although, the conclusions are not necessarily friendly to your cause.

Re:Interesting Story

jdavidb on 2006-03-03T18:05:24

The court found, basically, that Schwartz had diluted Intel's ability to preserve the confidentiality of the password data; since passwords have value "only so long as no one else knows what they are", Intel had "lost" something, even though it still had the actuall password data.

Ah, well, since the password file does not actually contain the passwords, that would not be a problem....

Re:Interesting Story

GAVollink on 2006-03-03T21:03:33

I think this was before shadow files became popular, just saying.

Re:Interesting Story

jdavidb on 2006-03-06T15:58:24

My comment stands without alteration.