The YAPC talk about Plagger was very interesting so I tried installing it.
The talk said installing Plagger was a challenge and so it proved. A couple of dozen dozen modules were required from CPAN, to make things worse I decided to install all the optional modules and tried to install on a machine I do not have root on. Things went kinda bad,lots of stuff needed paths for libs I did not have installed and header files that were no where to be seen,tests failed and due to some recent changes on redbrick cpan ended up mixing sparc and intel shared libs up together. I'll try again tomorrow on a machine I have root on, where the directories are used only by one architecture and choose less optional modules. Things can only get better.
Since my local install area was all messed up I cleaned it out, fixed my cpan config so it doesn't mix different arch shared libs up and started installing the modules I need for some local programs and a few small webaps of mine that other people use on a daily basis. This is where stuff gets a little annoying, applying tiny but important fixes to modules or ignoring failing tests and hoping they do not matter. Some of these have already had fixes accepted by the author but no subsequent cpan release have ever taken place, some the author has fallen off the side of the internet and no one has jumped in to take their place. If only there was some way we could quantify author awakiness, perform some loving restoration on important/unique/very useful modules that need it or bias search away from dead ends that have better more alive alternatives. The first half probably exists informally but the second sounds tough without some quantitative support infrastructure.
Re:We can do this already
Alias on 2006-09-04T06:21:04
I should note that the REAL problem is where the author is available, but won't do a release, or says they don't have the time to do it. But then they won't let anyone else do so either.
That is the only case we don't have a solution for at the moment.
Re:We can do this already
jk2addict on 2006-09-04T12:29:23
I'm not sure which of those I'm stuck in right now.
There are 2 RT reports for FormValidator::Simple from others (it destroys profiles), and 1 from me. None of them have been replied to, or put in status. It doesn't appear that anyone has heard form the author since the last release. I've submitted patches for the issues, and all of the original tests pass w/ them applied.
At this point, I'm hoping for the best. I really don't want to maint another dist, but I guess I'll have to if the author doesn't fall back on the planet, esp. since it's going to effect Handel and DBIx::Class::Validation somewhat.
Re:We can do this already
jk2addict on 2006-09-05T13:27:45
Woohoo! The FVS author is alive and well! That's good news.Re:We can do this already
link on 2006-09-04T12:28:57
As I said I am aware you can take over a module if you can convince the cpan gods to let you. The problem with that is that based on domms CPAN talk at YAPC::EU and the description of the module list on CPAN it sounds like the module list is dead or dying. Still plenty of posts however.
The main point is that lots of modules on CPAN do much the same as other modules. It would be nice if it was easy to tell which modules were short of a maintainer and be able to suggest modules that do much the same thing or to bias the search towards live modules. Sure I could take over modules that do not work but then I could write them from scratch too , the great thing about CPAN is all the prewritten working stuff so it would be nice to make it easier for users to find that good stuff and avoid dead ends.
Re:We can do this already
Alias on 2006-09-05T01:10:38
Poppycock.
The module list is staffed by volunteers, but it is active most of the time. It does go through the occasional quiet period when Brian is in Iraq or I'm overcomitted, but it's no worse now than it has ever been, and it's probably better that it has been in a long time.
And "If you can convince..." makes it sound hard.
It's not hard at all.
You just explain what you did you try to contact the author, and if it's reasonable (as in you tried a few times, and looked for alternative contact points), you get the module. There's no "convince" about it, and we don't apply any personal bias to the process.