One of my esteemed prior co-workers recommends that I follow git releases very closely. I've added a "git-update" command into my path so I can just say "git update" occasionally to get all the newest features and bugs.
#!/bin/bash ( set -e cd $HOME/src/git export PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin git fetch git clean -xdf git reset --hard git merge origin/master make configure sh configure --prefix=/opt/git make all doc sudo make install install-doc install-html )
One of my esteemed prior co-workers recommends that I follow git releases very closely.
Is git not yet stable? Is the bleeding edge still needed? For whom? Or is what a distro package manager (eg Ubuntu Paunty or Intrepid apt-get
s) provides good enough for most folks?
I've added a "git-update" command into my path so I can just say "git update" occasionally
Nice. That ability to extend it simply is awesome.
Since I would expect git-update
to operate against the remote repo for the current project directory, i might name this git-gitupdate
on my system to avoid misunderstanding.
to get all the newest features and bugs.
how good / bad is the features / bugs ratio?
Re:nice but why?
jjore on 2009-07-25T00:48:38
It pretty much just works so I don't worry about the bugs that much. My Ubuntu only goes up to 1.6.0.4 and I'm currently on 1.6.4.rc2. I forget what happened but I'm fairly sure I want to be at 1.6.2+.