"The only thing worse than being talked about... is not being talked about."
I don't think I'll ever really understand the publishing industry. When pjf said that one of my books is far harder to get hold of than the other, I was sure that it would be DMP that would be the hardest to get. I think we're getting pretty close to selling out of the second printing now and I doubt there will be a third (buy now! while stocks last!!)
But no, it's the badger book that Paul is having trouble with. It's apparently seen as such a minority technology that the Australian distributor doesn't keep copies in stock - just getting them from O'Reilly as they are ordered.
I guess the solution is to get more of a buzz going around TT so it's seen as a cool and popular tool (outside of just the Perl community).
Re:No more DMP?
davorg on 2004-10-01T11:19:06
Well, I don't know for sure. I'm just guessing here.
I have a plan tho'.
Re:Applicability
davorg on 2004-10-01T13:21:01
I see that. But alternatively, DMP is applicable to anyone who uses Perl and the badger is applicable to anyone who uses templates (not necessarily just people who use Perl and templates).
The fact that we're not getting to that (potentially much larger) second group is probably because TT is seen as a Perl tool, rather than a tool that just happens to be written in Perl. TT has a pretty good press within the Perl community, but it seems to be almost unknown outside of it. I need to put my Linux Format "Intro to TT" articles online. The first two of those didn't use any Perl at all.Re:Applicability
Matts on 2004-10-01T13:48:45
Yes, you're definitely missing that market, but I don't think that market really exists:-)
In order to do useful things with TT you have to be using perl for data structure generation, so the two are quite intimately tied together. It's not like XSLT where there are C implementations that can be embedded into other languages, unfortunately.