It would be possible to build a good argument that a Beatle's livespan is in inverse proportion to his talent.
Looks like Ringo be be around for a looong time then.
Hmmm... I wonder how Stu Sutcliffe and George Martin fit in to this theory...
Re:Theory needs more complexity...
davorg on 2001-11-30T15:47:39
Paul was certainly a more prolific songwriter and also a more popularist songwriter but, in my opinion, George wrote far better songs.
When I look at a list of my favourite Beatle's songs, most of them are Lennon songs, but Harrison wrote some great stuff - listen to "Within You, Without You", "If I Needed Someone" and (especially) "Piggies".
McCartney songs, on the other hand, I largely see as fillers.
Of course, this is all subjective and the Kinks were far better anyway
:) Re:Theory needs more complexity...
Purdy on 2001-11-30T19:18:49
At the expense of seeming totally naive, I've never heard any Kinks music (at least not intentionally). Must be b/c I'm married to a total Beatles fan...;) I'll go check out cdnow. Jason
Regardless of the theory, I'm afraid you hit the nail on the head - we're in for a LOOOOOOONG time w/ Ringo.
Celine Dion must be immortal then!
Re:all things being equal
pdcawley on 2001-11-30T16:49:08
Unless something happened while I wasn't looking, Ms Dion isn't a beatle, so the rule doesn't apply.
Please, please tell me something didn't happen while I wasn't looking. An immortal Celine Dion is just too much to contemplate.Re:all things being equal
Purdy on 2001-11-30T19:19:37
*LAUGH* you guys are too funny