[ comments enabled ]
Rules:
* the module's first released version had to have been uploaded to CPAN last year. If it was on CPAN prior to January 1, it does not count.
* nominations must be made in reply to this journal entry
* the winning module and nominator will get some sort of cool prize and something in The Perl Review.
* Andy Lester's modules are eligible, but mine, which are not cool anyway, are not.
* Acme:: modules are eligible.
Re:Why me?
brian_d_foy on 2002-12-29T09:39:35
They wouldn't be. I only said they were. Not that I would want to point out that you made some great modules this year and sway any votes or anything.:)
I'd like to nominate XML::SAX::Machines and DBD::SQLite.
"Perl Archive Toolkit"
http://search.cpan.org/author/AUTRIJUS/PAR-0.61/
regards,
PAR impresses me -- really really impresses me -- and Module::Signature has been much needed. I'll guess that anything Autrijus puts out is worth mentioning. Still, I immodestly use Test::MockObject more than any other module written in the last year. Make my life easier by disallowing author nominations.
