Comments for Perl Advent Calendar Entry 6th Dec 2003. Comments posted below may be displayed on perladvent.org.
Re:typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe iss
2shortplanks on 2003-12-09T18:30:27
Thanks for spotting that. I think I accidentally did that in the spell checkerYou're right about the spamc thing, I should probably let all the spamc's do their work.
Re:typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe iss
hughescr on 2003-12-09T18:41:06
Well, I wrote spamc/spamd -- and I would recommend letting them all work;) Re:typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe iss
drhyde on 2003-12-12T08:36:44
And thank *you* for doing all the work:-)
Re:speed of spamc using Mail::Audit?
2shortplanks on 2003-12-09T18:44:59
There's no reason that you couldn't switch to pperl and get most of the benifits of spamc. I think the author uses it (on an industrial scale) for the same stuff (or so he admits here.)I use procmail over Mail::Audit these days because I've found it to be more reliable - that's not to say I still don't use perl to do most of my mail filtering. Here's the bottom of my procmail script:
where_to_guv is a pperl script that just prints out the name of the mbox where my mail is to be filtered into. So I still get to use Mail::ListDetector and all the other nice Perl utilities that I use with Mail::Audit - I just don't get Mail::Audit to do my actual mail delivery anymore.WHERE=`where_to_guv ${MAILDIR} ${DEFAULT}`
:0:
${WHERE}