Shlomi Fish flames Perl community.
I could say a lot about it. Most of it is inconsistent. But mostly I will say that www.perl.org needs a rewrite.
Re:I Want To Care
jdavidb on 2003-04-25T15:22:08
I think the docs need to include a "How to fork politely" document to point discontented people at. If they feel up to it and are unhappy enough, they can always fork. If it looks better, they'll gain a following and pull an egcs. If not -- well, I care about as much as you.
I'm still waiting for Rindalf.
a big to-do about a perl.org rewrite after TPC last year? Perhaps I'm confusing it with something else or the myriad of stuff that people get all excited about at TPC and then forget about a month later. I suppose this is where you suggest the colour orange and the number 6
Re:wasn't there...
delegatrix on 2003-04-16T16:00:14
I did to a redesign of perl.org. It was supposed to be released last year but hasn't been yet. I'm not sure what the hold up is.Re:wasn't there...
autarch on 2003-04-16T17:33:39
I've seen a preview of the new version and it looks good, so Robert, go ahead and release early;) Re:wasn't there...
delegatrix on 2003-04-16T19:41:11
Thanks. I'd like to work on content for some of the other sites, too. Content and info architecture is a bigger issue than look&feel when dealing with overlapping sites.Re:wasn't there...
autarch on 2003-04-16T21:18:45
If you have any thoughts about datetime.perl.org or apprentice.perl.org feel free to tell me. Those I can update on my own as needed.
HASOF BAH! HASOF BAAAAAAAAAAH!
Re:"www.perl.org needs a rewrite" ...
acme on 2003-04-18T10:15:41
Excellent news!