Dear All,
So I came across the following passage, and I'm curious if you can guess where and when it refers to. I've blacked out the parts that could give it away.
Another idea, even more widespread, is that except for a few scholars, the _____ [nationality adjective] people are a mass of illiterate and, mentally, almost inert people who neither know nor care what goes on in the world at large, or even in _____ [the nation] as a whole. Among them, it is supposed, such a force as "public opinion" could hardly be said to exist, except as the masses are told what to think by the _____ who dominate them. In accord with this theory it has been assumed that in order to control _____ [the nation], a foreign government needed only to cultivate the favor of the high officials, or pay regular bribes to the ______. The people in general, it has been thought, could be ignored.So: where and when is this about?
For extra credit, guess the original language of the above language passage.
I'll post the answer in a few days.
This kind of crap does nothing but fan the flames of international discord and raise the import tariffs on Canadian Bacon.
Who's responsible for this garbage? I blame Canada.
Re:I wish people would stop dissing Canada
gizmo_mathboy on 2002-10-03T13:24:36
What would Brian Boitano do?
Re: My Guess
schuyler on 2002-10-03T22:48:37
I'm with Walt. My vote goes to Romans, referring to the Gauls or somesuch.Re: My Guess
hfb on 2002-10-04T00:19:20
Not the style of Caesar and Marcus Aurelius was far more diplomatic as I recall from the 8 years of Latin I endured. It could be a bad translation of Pliny but I'm guessing it's a bit more modern.
This can also be some asian country, about some other asian country -- and in this case this could be far older. Sun Tze ?
The name of Machiavel comes also to mind. Italy, XVIth century.
Another idea, even more widespread, is that except for a few scholars, the Chinese people are a mass of illiterate and, mentally, almost inert people who neither know nor care what goes on in the world at large, or even in China as a whole. Among them, it is supposed, such a force as "public opinion" could hardly be said to exist, except as the masses are told what to think by the bureaucrats who dominate them. In accord with this theory it has been assumed that in order to control China, a foreign government needed only to cultivate the favor of the high officials, or pay regular bribes to the warlords. The people in general, it has been thought, could be ignored.