I just published my second @political article. It's a recap of some of the events surrounding the Florida Election (need I say which one?). It's an interesting process digging into the meat of a situation and finding different takes on it. What I found fascinating was that, with few exceptions, the US media conclusions that Bush would have won the recount seemed fairly accurate -- because a recount only counts who voted and ignores the issue of disenfranchisement. Unfortunately, due to length limits on the article, I really couldn't present everything as well as I would have liked and I think the information suffers for it.
Comments disabled here to avoid fanning the flames.
