All Journals RSS

Dom2 on 2006-09-18T19:51:04

Is there a way to get a full text feed of all the use.perl journals? The feed on offer for the main journals page is somewhat limited -- it only has the titles and doesn't link through to the individual articles.

I only ask because up until now, I'd used "friends journals" to keep track of everybody. But I've just bumped into a limit -- only 200 friends are allowed. And it would be far more sensible to just read all new journals...


See my journal reader

brian_d_foy on 2006-09-18T20:43:44

I read all journal entries from my terminal using my journal reader script. It connects to use.perl through its SOAP interface, then outputs the entries according to a template. It shouldn't be too hard to translate that into a template to do an RSS feed.

Re:See my journal reader

Dom2 on 2006-09-18T21:46:39

Thanks, I'll give that a try. It just bugs me that the site doesn't provide it by default...

I know, I know. "patches welcome" :-)

-Dom

It takes luck to find it

Aristotle on 2006-09-18T21:05:08

You can turn most list pages on use Perl into feeds using the content_format query parameter, including a feed of the generic journal search. That gives you a feed with everyone’s posts, and each item links through to the specific post in question, though there’s no fulltext. Despite the last point, I find it helps enough to make reading along tolerable.

Re:It takes luck to find it

Dom2 on 2006-09-18T21:45:40

Sadly, that just spits out html for me. :-(

-Dom

Re:It takes luck to find it

Aristotle on 2006-09-18T21:58:51

Gah, because the parameter is called content_type; so another try at linking a useful all-journals feed.

Re:It takes luck to find it

Dom2 on 2006-09-18T22:19:57

Many thanks; that works much better. it could be improved, however. :-)

-Dom

Re:It takes luck to find it

Aristotle on 2006-09-19T00:29:07

Yeah, I’ve wondered before why the feed doesn’t contain at least the short plaintext snippets that are shown on the journals search page. But I don’t care that much; I read everything, anyway.

Agreed.

jcap on 2006-09-19T13:25:14

I've been wanting this feature as well, and I know of numerous other people who do too. However the site admins don't have a desire to support it.

Re:Agreed.

Dom2 on 2006-09-19T19:14:03

More than likely, it's simply because the feature isn't applicable to slashdot, which is what the codebase is aimed at. I certainly wouldn't call the oversight malicious in any way...

-Dom