Xming: libre standalone X.org-based X server for Windows

Aristotle on 2007-08-12T03:30:55

I just saw Xming mentioned by Jeni Tennison. It’s an X server based on X.org that does not require Cygwin and integrates directly with PuTTY. Awesome! I had been looking for such a thing for quite a while.


Is it any good though?

ajt on 2007-08-12T11:14:27

I saw a link to this last week but have not tried it yet. Only work forces me to use Windows, my own boxes are all Linux so it's something I only need a little.

Re:Is it any good though?

Aristotle on 2007-08-12T12:42:59

Seemed to work just fine for me. I haven’t used it enough to give a qualified evaluation though. I’m in the same boat: I don’t need it much.

Re:Is it any good though?

ajt on 2007-08-12T17:54:00

Fair enough. I suppose it's worth a try then. Are you running the free or the compulsory-donationware version?

Re:Is it any good though?

Aristotle on 2007-08-13T05:43:33

Just the free.

Cygwin/X has lapsed?

jdavidb on 2007-08-16T15:18:27

What do they mean that work on Cygwin/X has lapsed?

I use Cygwin extensively, including X. Seems like Xming wouldn't work so well for me because I also need all the UNIX tools locally. (Although I guess I could just set up a box for that purpose, but at home I want it all on my laptop.) I update Cygwin's packages frequently. Is nobody maintaining the Cygwin X packages?

Re:Cygwin/X has lapsed?

Aristotle on 2007-08-16T15:58:05

What do I know? I have no idea whatsoever.

Cygwin’s terrible path mapping breaks my brain, though. I hate it with a passion. I much prefer to simply run Unix tools directly under Windows, so I use GnuWin32 for the Unix toolkit and generally standalone whenever available, preferrably native free software where it makes sense, eg. PuTTY.

Hence Xming rather than Cygwin/X.

If you’re happy with Cygwin, I’m not gonna care – more’s the better for you.