Perl 6 Design Meeting Notes for 29 November 2006

brian_d_foy on 2006-12-02T01:53:00

The Perl 6 Design team met via phone on 29 November 2006. Larry, Damian, Allison, Patrick, Jesse, and chromatic attended. These are the notes.

The Perl 6 Design team met via phone on 29 November 2006. Larry, Damian, Allison, Patrick, Jesse, and chromatic attended. These are the notes.

Patrick:

  • things are going well
  • keeping busy
  • making good progress
  • made the new PAST implementation
  • seems to be working out really well
  • has the right primitives in the right places for the kinds of compilers I've been working on
  • Allison's given me tons of great feedback
  • I'm slowly incorporating her ideas
  • having tons of fun doing all that
  • have lots more of the sanity tests implemented for Perl 6
  • have some implemented but not checked in
  • I'm letting that simmer before I check in improvements
  • finding a couple of sanity tests that build on non-standard Perl 6 features
  • I'll do some commits to bring them in line with the latest specs
  • hope to have that working in the next couple of weeks
  • could start running the Pugs test suite then
  • might just point people to my #parrotsketch reports (pmichaud #parrotsketch report for 21 November 2006 and pmichaud #parrotsketch report for 28 November 2006)
  • spent an hour walking PerlJam through the compiler tools on #parrot
  • I logged it; it'll go into the repository as an overview

c:

  • think I've basically convinced Allison of the value of a MOP for Parrot
  • will work on that a little bit more
  • I had a prototype a couple of months ago
  • I'll refresh that

Allison:

  • Patrick's stuff has kicked forward the design of the compiler tools
  • I've played with it in Punie; have lots of feedback on it
  • I'm just about ready to commit it
  • I have the last lingering little bits of the IO PDD
  • it's pretty much just the Parrot IO object API
  • not a big piece
  • reading a bit on Ruby metaclasses
  • we had a really good conversation about Parrot objects after #parrotsketch
  • I have a much better grasp on the scope of the problem
  • some of the most important questions

Patrick:

  • that's an astounding achievement
  • it's difficult to do
  • it's also very important and necessary
  • I'm ecstatic with the conversation that took place
  • that's exactly what I wanted to hear

Allison:

  • I expect we'll have snippets like that every once in a while
  • that seems to be really helpful
  • oh, and maybe we'll use roles instead of metaclasses

Larry:

  • keeping my fingers lightly on everything that's going on
  • thinking a lot about discussions on p6l
  • come to a conclusion on bags and sets
  • haven't come to a conclusion about some of the questions of closures
  • touches on the nature of dynamic versus lexical scoping
  • the relationship of those versus STM
  • some of those popped up for Parrot lately too
  • did a lot of driving last week for some reason
  • also converting some of my CJK radical dictionary programs to Perl 6
  • fairly happy with those results
  • anxiously looking forward to running those on the Parrot backend

Allison:

  • it would be interesting to get a list of features that you need

Patrick:

  • that would prioritize things
  • or turn the code into tests somehow
  • I can target those tests first

Larry:

  • other than the basic syntax
  • the main thing I've used is roles instead of inheritance
  • the roles turn out to be somewhat faster than inheritance
  • composition time is more direct
  • it's a hand optimization
  • in theory the compiler ought to perform it for me, but it doesn't
  • I'm not performing much fancy stuff

Patrick:

  • the big stumbling block for now is the angle bracket as list constructors
  • parsing that is a trick

Jesse:

  • how much spec change do you end up making as you hack?

Larry:

  • not a lot
  • we're definitely in the mode where we try to fill in the cracks that we didn't think about
  • those implicitly implied by the things that are already there
  • the earth-shaking changes tend to be few and far between
  • mostly it's just going over it to see if we're saying everything we want to say

Damian:

  • still struggling with time issues
  • within one feature of having the POD 6 parser released
  • likely a week or two away

Patrick:

  • I have a question about coordinating test suites
  • as I get close to finishing the sanity tests for the Perl 6 compiler, people will clamor for importing the Pugs test suite into the Parrot repo
  • should we clarify that somehow?
  • any advice on how to proceed?

Allison:

  • the answer is "yes, we can just import the test suite"
  • Audrey is okay with that
  • we need to try to get contributor agreements from people who have committed to the test suite
  • we don't have to wait to get those first
  • we do need to try to get the names of contributors
  • we'll have someone gradually work on that

c:

  • can we use svn:externals to keep them synchronized?

Jesse:

  • I'd hate to see them fall out of synchronization

Patrick:

  • I'd like to see a single test suite
  • I have difficulty seeing how to coordinate working between two repos

Jesse:

  • I hear that the Pugs folks are willing to do plenty of work to make that work

Larry:

  • even just copy and paste

Allison:

  • they do need to ship with stable Parrot releases

Jesse:

  • you can do imports or mirroring

Allison:

  • you don't want to require everyone to be a committer on the Pugs project to contribute to the tests though
  • even though it's trivially easy
  • Perl 6 and Parrot are two independent projects
  • maybe we need an independent repository for the Perl 6 test suite
  • neither Pugs nor Parrot
  • make sure that the infrastructure code for both call into the implementation-agnostic test suite repository

Jesse:

  • I worry about what that'll mean for commit bits about the independent test suite
  • Pugs does have mirroring into svn.perl.org

Patrick:

  • maybe I don't understand how it works
  • if I'm working in Parrot's Perl 6 and I need to add a test, what do I do?
  • do I svn up for Pugs, add a test, commit a test, then svn up for Parrot?

Jesse:

  • would you object to always using the tests directly from the Pugs repository until something sane gets worked out?
  • it's not a discussion we can make a decision on here now
  • it has to involve the Pugs people too

Allison:

  • that's fine
  • I'd eventually like the test suite to be pure Perl 6
  • or at least abstracted from any implementation infrastructure

Jesse:

  • seems to be a reasonable goal once it's not a moving target

Allison:

  • don't wait for that to happen!

Jesse:

  • I don't want to yank the Pugs test suite, make it the official test suite, and then make it hard for them to contribute to it

Allison:

  • oh, absolutely not

c:

  • we have a repository for the specification documents
  • why not put the test suite in that repository?
  • not everyone can commit to the specs and Synopses, but that repo

Allison:

  • how about this?
  • Pugs remains for now the primary repo
  • all commits to there
  • the Perl svn repo gets a mirror of those tests (not the full Pugs mirror)
  • we work on the tests to remove any code specific to a particular implementation
  • get the tests generic when we can

general agreement